ass3: Add answer to question about inhomogenity

This commit is contained in:
2022-03-15 19:14:40 +01:00
parent c59f7eb6e9
commit d9adf54595
2 changed files with 29 additions and 0 deletions

BIN
lec4-vortexlattice.png Executable file

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 37 KiB

View File

@ -71,6 +71,35 @@ The average field inside the cylinder is given by the following self-consisting
Plugging in the values for \ce{Nb3Sn}, $B_E = \SI{1}{\tesla}$, and $\phi_0 = \SI{2.0678}{\weber}$, $B$ is found as $B = \SI{.986}{\tesla} \approx B_E$ by intersection.
%https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=B+%3D+1+-+%282.0678*10%5E-15%29%2F%288*pi*%28124*10%5E-9%29%5E2%29+*+ln%282.0678*10%5E-15%2F%284*exp%281%29*%283.65*10%5E-9%29%5E2+*+B%29%29
To investigate the inhomogenity of the field inside the cylinder, we look at the gradient $\nabla B$ inside the material.
As we assume a vortex lattice that fully fills the cross section of the cylinder,
and we assume that the fields due to each vortex die out quickly enough to not overlap,
it suffices to calculate the gradient over just one vortex.
These assumptions coincide with slide 15 of lecture 4, from which I took figure \ref{fig:lec4-vortexlattice}
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\label{fig:lec4-vortexlattice}
\includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{lec4-vortexlattice.png}
\caption{The vortices are arranged in a lattice to maximize their distance, as this lowers their repulsive interaction and thus the energy.}
\end{figure}
On slide 19 from the same week, we find an expression $B(r)$ for the field at distance $r$ from the vortex core as
\[
B = \frac{\phi_0}{2\pi\lambda^2} K_0(r/\lambda) = B_0 K_0(r/\lambda),
\]
where $K_0$ is the modified Bessel function of the second kind.
For small $r$ (i.e. $r << \lambda$), we can approximate this and find that
\[
K_0 \propto - \ln{(r/\lambda)},
\]
and notice a singularity at $r = 0$.
For the gradient we thus find
\[
\nabla B \propto \pfrac{K_0}{r}(r/\lambda) \propto \pfrac{-\ln{(r/\lambda)}}{r} = -1/r.
\]
The size of the supercurrent density has the same relation, $J_S \propto 1/r$.
\section{Superconducting wire}
\section{Fine type-II superconducting wire}