From d542257b0f2273534ee5eabde9408897e89d4d44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kees van Kempen Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:57:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ass1: Add conclusion to question 1 --- superconductivity_assignment1_kvkempen.tex | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/superconductivity_assignment1_kvkempen.tex b/superconductivity_assignment1_kvkempen.tex index 43306c2..e3461ee 100755 --- a/superconductivity_assignment1_kvkempen.tex +++ b/superconductivity_assignment1_kvkempen.tex @@ -107,6 +107,8 @@ Further distinction could be in superconductor type. Most of the plotted elements are type-I superconductors, but vanadium, for example, is type-II. Vanadium does, however, behave similar to the rest of the elements. +In conclusion, the statement that superconductivity is more likely to be observed in metals whose normal state is highly resistive is rejected by this analysis of the superconducting elements. + \section{Exam question electrodynamics in superconductors} No idea yet.