ass5: Look at Ozcan's results

references.bib

@@ -165,4 +165,20 @@ Results from previous neutron measurements are found to be consistent with the X
 	month = jun,
 	year = {1993},
 	pages = {3999--4002},
-}
+}
+
+@article{paglione_quantum_2016,
+	title = {Quantum {Critical} {Quasiparticle} {Scattering} within the {Superconducting} {State} of {CeCoIn} 5},
+	volume = {117},
+	issn = {0031-9007, 1079-7114},
+	url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.016601},
+	doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.016601},
+	language = {en},
+	number = {1},
+	urldate = {2022-05-18},
+	journal = {Physical Review Letters},
+	author = {Paglione, Johnpierre and Tanatar, M. A. and Reid, J.-Ph. and Shakeripour, H. and Petrovic, C. and Taillefer, Louis},
+	month = jun,
+	year = {2016},
+	pages = {016601},
+}

superconductivity_assignment5_kvkempen.tex

@@ -212,7 +212,29 @@ They are, however, kept constant, and $\lambda$ is what is varied by changing th
 With knowledge about $\lambda(0)$ from other sources, $\lambda(T)$ is determined by determining $\Delta \lambda$ from $\delta f$.
 Now the superfluid density can be determined.
 
+In \cite{ozcan}, heavy-fermion superconductor \ce{CeCoIn5} is investigated using the TDO technique to measure its penetration depth.
+It is an unconventional superconductor, and the question is what type of wave-symmetry it exhibits.
+The paper found a non-linear $\lambda(T)$ relation.
+See figure \ref{fig:linear-lambda} for their results.
+They do conclude that the material is in a $d_{x^2-y^2}$ superconductor ground state.
+I would expect there to be no nodes in the band gap energy, in this case, which however is the case.
+The authors also seem puzzled at the beginning.
+They suspect strong-scattering impurities to alter the $\lambda(T)$ relation.
+To exclude this possibility, they checked a couple of possible explanations.
+Purity was checked and impurity content was determined to be a factor 100 smaller than the deviation in $\lambda(T)$ would imply.
+Other theories were also ruled out, on impossibility of far-fetchedness.
+They conclude by proposing non-Fermi-liquid renormalisation in both the normal and superconducting state of \ce{CeCoIn5} to take place, yielding the well fitting relation as seen in the inset of figure \ref{fig:linear-lambda}.
+This means that their would be quantum criticality in the superconducting state, i.e. a phase transition at zero temperature.
+That would be exotic.
+In conclusion, the behavior of \ce{CeCoIn5} was not explained with certainty at the point this paper was published (2003), although quantum criticality was a possibility.
+However, years later (2014), further research supports their hypothesis \cite{paglione_quantum_2016}.
 
+\begin{figure}
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[width=.6\textwidth]{ozcan-linear.png}
+	\caption{For \ce{CeCoIn5}, $\lambda(T) \propto T^2/(T-T^*)$ is plotted in the main plot. In the inset, the concluding hypothesis of the authors \cite{ozcan} is presented, i.e. $\lambda(T) \propto T^{1.5}$.}
+	\label{fig:linear-lambda}
+\end{figure}
 
 \bibliographystyle{vancouver}
 \bibliography{references.bib}